DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0551.14.1.2019.157880

Approaches to the surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot in children

A.F. Levitsky, A.V. Karabenyuk, A.A. Golubenko

Abstract


Background. The clubfoot is a severe deformity of the foot. The birth rate of children with congenital clubfoot is 0.1–0.4 %. Since the end of the 1980s, when the technique of I. Ponseti gained worldwide recognition, early conservative treatment using staged plaster casts has been the main feature. The effectiveness of this technique reaches 93 % and can significantly reduce the number of surgical interventions. However, delayed treatment, the absence or non-compliance with the mode of wearing braces, concomitant neurological pathology lead to a decrease in the effectiveness of conservative treatment and the use of surgery. The objective of the study is a retrospective analysis of the results of applying our surgical method for congenital clubfoot in children. Materials and methods. From 2009 to 2017, 87 children (57 boys (78 feet) and 30 girls (37 feet)) with congenital clubfoot were treated surgically in the orthopaedics and trauma unit of National Children Specialized Hospital “OHMATDYT”. During the study, we have taken into account the age, sex, type of deformity, volume of surgical intervention, immediate results of surgical treatment (up to 1 year), frequency of relapses. Sixty seven patients (83 feet) were operated for the first time, and in 20 children (32 feet), surgical treatment was repeated. The average age of patients was 4.5 years. Results. The immediate results of treatment (1 year after the operation) were good in 65 patients (74.7 %), satisfactory — in 14 (16 %) and unsatisfactory — in 8 (9.3 %). Two (2.3 %) patients had elements of excessive correction of deformity, which was manifested by pronation with valgus deformity of the heel. Relapses manifested by the appearance of one of deformity elements were detected in 8 (9.2 %) cases. The main their causes were non-compliance with the recommendations at the stages of rehabilitation (6 patients) and postoperative complications (2 patients). Conclusions. Immediate results of treatment (1 year after surgery) indicate the correctness of our approach for surgical reconstruction of the foot in patients with clubfoot.


Keywords


foot deformity; congenital clubfoot; surgical treatment

References


Brodko VG, Sakalouski OA, Brodko GA. Congenital clubfoot: review of the problem. Medicinskie novosti. 2014;(235):12-15. (in Russian).

Levytskyi AF, Karabenyuk OV, Golubenko OO. Innovations in the conservative treatment of congenital clubfoot in children under 1 year of age. Travma. 2016;17(3):99-102. doi: 10.22141/1608-1706.3.17.2016.75787. (in Ukrainian).

Vavilov MA, Blandinskii VF, Gromov IV, Baushev MA. Comparing the long-term results of treating children with clubfoot. Genij Ortopedii. 2016;(3):39-42. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2016-3-39-42. (in Russian).

Revkovich AS, Ryzhikov DV, Semenov AL, Gubina EV, Andreev AV. Treatment of recurrent congenital clubfoot. Modern problems of science and education. 2015;(5):193. (in Russian).

Chand S, Mehtani A, Sud A, Prakash J, Sinha A, Agnihotri A. Relapse following use of Ponseti method in idiopathic clubfoot. J Child Orthop. 2018 Dec 1;12(6):566-574. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180117.

Jeans KA, Karol LA, Erdman AL, Stevens WR Jr. Functional Outcomes Following Treatment for Clubfoot: Ten-Year Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 5;100(23):2015-2023. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00317.

Funk J, Lebek S. Clubfoot Therapy in Accordance with Ponseti - Current Standard. Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Nov 27. doi: 10.1055/a-0762-1241. (in German).

Chen C, Wang TM, Wu KW, Huang SC, Kuo KN. Comparison of two methods for idiopathic clubfoot treatment: A case-controlled study in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Aug 24. pii: S0929-6646(18)30057-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.08.001.

He JP, Shao JF, Hao Y. Comparison of different conservative treatments for idiopathic clubfoot: Ponseti's versus non-Ponseti's methods. J Int Med Res. 2017 Jun;45(3):1190-1199. doi: 10.1177/0300060517706801.

Sætersdal C, Fevang JM, Bjørlykke JA, Engesæter LB. Ponseti method compared to previous treatment of clubfoot in Norway. A multicenter study of 205 children followed for 8-11 years. J Child Orthop. 2016 Oct;10(5):445-52. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0760-6.

Smythe T, Chandramohan D, Bruce J, Kuper H, Lavy C, Foster A. Results of clubfoot treatment after manipulation and casting using the Ponseti method: experience in Harare, Zimbabwe. Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Oct;21(10):1311-1318. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12750.

Lykissas MG, Crawford AH, Eismann EA, Tamai J. Ponseti method compared with soft-tissue release for the management of clubfoot: A meta-analysis study. World J Orthop. 2013 Jul 18;4(3):144-53. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.144.

Sharaf Ibrahim. Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics: from the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children. 5th ed. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2015;9(1):53. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1503.012.

Kokavec M, Gajdos M, Kusin M, Novorolsky K. "Different" approach in the operative treatment of congenital clubfoot and its results. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2006;107(3):85-8.

Ponseti IV, Zhivkov M, Davis N, Sinclair M, Dobbs MB, Morcuende JA. Treatment ofthe complex idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Oct;451:171-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224062.39990.48.




Copyright (c) 2019 CHILD`S HEALTH

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2018

 

   Seo анализ сайта